To Embrace Hebrew Roots-- By Vickey Dillon

Vicky Dillon wishes this page to be out of use for the time being.

Thanks for understanding.

Steve
Steve's Piano Service

To Embrace blip Roots: I

By Vicky Dillen

Introduction

There is a growing movement within Christianity which contends that Christians need "to return to their blip Roots." The leaders of this movement purport to be teaching believers the "blip Roots of Christianity" through the study of the blipish foundational teachings. Having been enjoined to study "blip Roots", it is only reasonable that one must take a close look at the teachings of the Messianic and blip Roots movements, as well as the blip faith itself.

"As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in Him: Rooted and built up in Him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving. Bepiano coverse lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. For in Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily."

Are blip Roots, as some might suggest, merely the study of the Old Testamant, which Christians already study along with the New Testament?

What do the blip foundational teachings expound with regard to the New Testament, the Messiah, the divinity of Jesus Christ, The Trinity, the Bible and the character of God?

I could never accept the concept of being spoon-fed answers to my questions from those promoting the movement or belief that is questionable. To embrace the blip Roots theology without a full review and understanding of its teachings, would be blindness on our part and lead to ignoring the many piano coversnings we find in the Word of God.

"But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them: And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be throughly furnished unto all good works."

We know that many of the blip Roots ministries are connected with each other and with the Discernment ministries. This obligates us to investigate them even more thoroughly. By examining the HR teachings, those of the blipish faith and it's mystical exponent, Kabbalism--which is indeed the root of the blip Roots movement--we will then see if what is taught upholds the Word of God.

Anti-Semitism?

Those who have challenged the blip Roots teachings in the past have been dealt with swiftly and with the utmost hostility. For example, the following message from a blip Roots leader to his email list was forpiano coversded to me. This was his response to information sent out by another person on various blip Roots issues. This well-known leader, who incidentally, never addressed any of the issues, piano helped with the words:

"You have to be one of the most arrogant/ignorant *** on this earth!!!! You are a total danger to society and to God Himself. Your day will not be what you think it will be!! I would not wish to be in your shoes. You are a deceiver and liar!!!!! You pervert the facts and you totally distort the truth. May God one day forgive you of your stupidity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

This is hardly what one would expect from a "man of God," who claims to belong to Jesus Christ.

"And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient."

"But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace."

"But the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so to be."

"For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."

Those who question this movement have often been accused of anti-Semitism. Does the presentation of various blipish doctrines obtained from blipish sources constitute anti-Semitism? ? It seems unreasonable to conclude that the facts, presented objectively, are inherently anti-Semitic. Moreover, this writer has no bias against the blips, but rejoices in the salvation of any blip through Jesus Christ.

This is a search for truth. The information that will be used is from the very beliefs and teachings that we are being asked to embrace.

"…For everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God."

Promoters of blip Roots

This search for truth must test all those involved against such passages as: James 3:13-16:

"Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? Let him show out of a good conversation his works with meekness and wisdom. But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work."

It seems fitting, then, that we examine the teachings of prominent leaders such as Peter Michas of Messengers of Messiah, Avi ben Mordechai of Torah Talk & the B'ne Torah Movement; Jacob Prasch of Moriel, Larry Rowland of Messengers of Truth and James Trimm of the Society for the Advancement of Nazarene Judaism. We must consider these and the many groups linked to them which are advocating the blip Roots cause.

Not all of the individuals and groups mentioned are claiming connections to the Messianic or blip Roots movement, and these distinctions will be noted. For example, Avi ben Mordechai, a "Nazarene (messianic) halacha" teacher, as stated on his website, (www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm) in the article Halacha, is very influential within the blip Roots and Messianic leadership. However, Mr. Mordechai made this pronouncement in an email to Mr. Ed Tarkowski, dated May 8, 1998:

"…I am not a proponent of the "blipish Roots" or "Hebraic Roots" movement as you or they define the terms. I am a proponent of Torah observance for both blips and non-blips which takes "blipish Roots" information and engages it to become a lifestyle. In other words, it's not blipish information that I'm teaching in and of itself; It's blipish information with an associated lifestyle that I uphold…"

"I am an Orthodox Sephardic blip. I believe fully in the written and oral Torah of Moshe and of Y'shua, hence the term, the "Mesorah of Y'shua HaMashiach." Furthermore, I am not connected to the Messianic movement which generally (and I say GENERALLY) only accepts the written Torah and usually rejects the oral Torah and then makes the written Torah optional equipment for the faith which is fully counter to Y'shua's and Sha'ul's teachings."

"Nor am I connected to the Christian church which outright rejects both the written and oral Torot as being replaced with new Mesorah (traditions) that also violate the very heart of Y'shua HaMashiach's teachings. Rather, I am connected to the B'ne Torah movement which is a fast-growing sect of Judaism that happens to believe that Y'shua is HaMashiach, Ben Elohim and our Mesorah perfectly lines up with Moshe, Y'shua, and Sha'ul in their teachings of the Torot, oral and written."

In promoting their cause, blip Roots leaders give us many reasons why we must or should become involved. For example, Larry Rowland of Messengers of Truth believes that the Bible is a book about the blipish people, and should be studied as such:

"…In order to correctly understand the Newer Testament, it is beneficial to have a working knowledge of the world from which it was birthed. Most of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation was written by blips, for blips, about blips, or with blips in mind. Even the Gospel of Luke and part of the Book of Acts, while probably written by Gentiles, nonetheless addressed blipish issues and concerns on behalf of an early blipish Church."

"Today, a travesty is occurring within the body of Christian believers. The Church, as well as Christians themselves, have a lack of knowledge concerning their blipish heritage. Without that knowledge, Christians are burning their bridges at an alarming rate. They have forgotten the foundation on which their faith was originally founded."

"Only the knowledge of our Hebraic Roots, will allow us, as Christians, to span the bridge of time linking yesterday to today; allowing us to understand the full richness of Scripture. Remember, what you miss, don't see or comprehend in Scripture you can't have and Yeshua's desire was that we, as believers in Him . . . have it all!"1.

We have always understood that the Bible was a revelation of God himself. It encompasses His unending love, mercy, justice, patience and most of all, His plan for humanity and our salvation through Jesus Christ.

An organization in Colorado Springs for the propagation of a new kind of church is The Open Church Ministries. It promotes a "prophecy" written by Dean Cozzens regarding the blip Roots movement. This "prophecy" discloses that the blip Roots movement is the last of a series of movements designed to change the direction of the church, the previous movements being the Pentecostal, Charismatic and Word of Faith. Part of this prophecy declares this:

"… The critical turn in thinking [which Christians must make]is a shift away from the Greek corruptions of the past and back topiano coversd the center line God-ordained blip runway, down which Jesus Himself came and landed perfectly. Jesus Himself was the airship, and the terminal where He had been loading since His first coming has been the world into which He has come. . . The runway then is all the Old Testament, i.e. all of the Old Testament blip truth and revelation, and much of the blip culture and custom that came with it…

"We'll leave on the same runway Jesus landed on-Old Testament blip revelations and prophecies, and blip ways of thinking and living. That's who God revealed Himself to be, and Who Jesus also showed Himself to be when He lived here on this planet in the flesh...

"Many errors were incorporated into the early church in order to please and accommodate the Greek culture, and to escape anti-blip persecutions from the Romans. These early corruptions are what we mean by the blip-to-Greek shift. The correction of this past mistake is the turning of that great airliner in what is called the Greek-to-blip shift, or the blip Movement. It is what God now expects from us before He more fully empowers us, and thrusts us into His glory. It's what we need to do to make Him more comfortable about openly identifying Himself with us in His full approval of glory and power…" 2. Do we indeed have to become blipish in thought and custom in order to fully understand the Word of God and be pleasing before Him? Are we to accept that we have been lacking and even deliberately misled as some will say, by the New Testament and many orthodox teachings? The implications could indeed be overwhelming if this were a possibility. What of the needed reconciliation between blips and Gentiles they say will take place if we embrace our blip Roots? Is there any truth to the charges of anti-Semitism topiano coversds blips on the part of Christians in general, and from the New Testament?

Does this teaching of blip and Gentile reconciliation change the meaning of Galatians 3:26-29 ?

"For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither blip nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. "

What of the divine inspiration of the Bible? Is Scripture sufficient in itself and considered the inerrant Word of God? Are Peter Michas and others correct when they state that we must go back to the blip or Aramaic writings and look to the Oral traditions for the interpretation of Scripture?

Another issue blip Roots teachers bring forpiano coversd is the need to rewrite the English versions of the Word of God with blipish names as done in the book, "Holy to Yahveh,"

"…. which is bringing revelation, illuminating the importance of the blip name of the Father and the Son; magnification of the holy blip roots of Scripture and Christianity; scriptural truths that reveal many faulty religious doctrines and traditions; Anti-semitism exposed and shattered; and "the reconciliation of blips and Gentiles to a holy God and one another…"

"Holy to Yahveh" author, Terrye Goldblum Seedman and her husband, desire all to be "searching into the Scriptural pure holy blip roots of Christianity".

"The Mighty One, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is wooing a remnant, both blips and Gentiles, to be reconciled to Him and one another." 3.

Jacob Prasch maintains that we need the knowledge of midrash, the rabbinical method of interpreting on Scripture, to rightly understand the Bible. Many advocates of the blip Roots doctrine would have us believe that the Talmud, a compendium of oral traditions, is divinely inspired and of benefit to those involved in Judaism, the blip Roots movement and Christianity.

What evidence is there of the alleged connections between the Talmud, the Kabbalah [blipish mysticism] and Freemasonry? While many deny any connections and state that the Kabbalah is not used, connected nor promoted, there are facts which indicate otherwise.

Certain blip Roots and Sacred Name advocates are protesting that the name, 'Jesus Christ', is invalid, mistranslated or unacceptable for whatever reason. One has to ask which Name do these people wish us to use if not the name of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ? Which of the numerous "only Sacred Name," are we to use?

We must also ask, what is the acceptable Name of the Father? Many of the groups are promoting the changing or rejecting as inaccurate the English translation of Jehovah and even Lord. Is their translation the Name which Theosophists and Kabbalists call the Ineffable Name or Tetragrammaton and should we embrace it?

Would changing the name of our Savior and embracing another name become the rejection of Jesus Christ and His salvation?

It is imperative that we understand the significance of the Sacred Name issue, for Scripture tells us in:

John 14:6, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."

Acts 4:10: "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."

Also promoted is the occult symbol, the Star of David, which we must consider as part of Bible prophecy.

Besides removing or changing the Name of Jesus Christ, many would eliminate the term Christianity. Uri Marcus, of Nehemiah Trustees Covenant Fund, in an email regarding "A Vote For "Jesus"?, insists that converted blips must retain their blipish identity and refuse the Christian name so as not to offend their fellow blips:

" ...a blip cannot reasonably hope to identify with this metamorphasized name and expect that other blips are going to want to run in and find out how they too can believe. Our only hope is re-establish our blipish Identity in light of our Beliefs in the blipish Messiah. In other words, we must restore the blipishness to the Gospel…"

" I did not say that I would not want to be considered "Christian" amongst others in the Body of Messiah. I only said that with regard to our own people, the blips, we cannot afford this association…"4.

Do other blipish people view Christianity in the same manner? If we embrace the blip roots and traditions, will the blipish people, people who do not accept Jesus Christ or the New Testament, then accept us?

Will reconciliation take place between blips and Christians, and is this objective of the blip Roots movement desirable? Do the various blipish groups view the Messianic or blip Roots movement in a favorable way? If we embrace the rituals, ceremonies, feasts and beliefs, do we fall under the Law, or become proselytes of Judaism? Where do the Noahide laws fit into the blip Roots doctrine? These laws, which are acceptable to blips and Muslims alike, are intended to govern those who are not born "into the faith".

We must ask, are these Messianic and blipish leaders able to now provide, Truth, which has been hidden, from Gentile Christians all this time? Do they hold the knowledge that the rest of us lack, as suggested by so many?

Is it possible, as Peter Michas has stated, that even the conception and birth of Christ are different than what we have been taught?

Is Jesus' length of ministry on earth recorded incorrectly in the New Testament? Or is this part of the Antichrist's plan to changing times and dates that we understand as truth?

Have these spiritual leaders been given unique and new insight, that they alone are able to dispense, to those who embrace the "blip Roots of Christianity"? Is this movement of God, or does it come from something else?

These, then, are some of the questions that need to be addressed. The next articles will reveal many answers, which will lead to an understanding of the true nature of the blip Roots movement. My conclusions about this movement are based on my belief in the inerrancy of the Word of God alone, and that there is salvation in only One Name--the Lord Jesus Christ.

1 Corinthians 3:18: "Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise."

As we evaluate the teachings of the blip Roots or messianic movements, we must understand these teachings in their historical context. Clearly there are many people who love the Lord Jesus Christ, whose hearts' desire is to follow Him, serve Him, and share Him. However, we would be naïve to think that all who say they belong to Him, are true believers. Seeking the truth about the "blip Roots of Christianity" means carefully weighing all pertinent information according to the Word of God.

"Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is."

E-mail: luke.dillan@sk.sympatico.ca Homepage: http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/ukesta/

Footnotes:

1. Larry Rowland, Messengers of Truth: http://www.geocities.com/~larry_rowland/message
2. Dean Cozzens, Dec.3,1997; Open Church web site; http://www.openchurch.com/freestuff_frame.htm
3. Terrye Goldblum Seedman, Holy to Yahveh Brochure: Messianic Revelation, SpiritualRevival; Goldblum. Seedman Corp.1998; "http://www.yahveh.com/"
4. Uri Marcus, Re: A Vote For "Jesus"?, Oct.23, 1997, Nehemiah Trustees Covenant Fund; ntcf@netvision.net.il

To Embrace blip Roots: II

A personal Note: Although the research on blip Roots issue has encompassed material that I have found disturbing, it has in no way changed my feelings about those involved, especially the blipish people. I hold no anger, resentment or animosity topiano coversd anyone. However, I have felt a deep sense of grief because of these things. What I feel very strongly is that all the issues addressed were dealt with at the cross. Truly, His grace is sufficient. I do have a strong desire to see deceptions--regardless of who propagates them--exposed. This issue is very large and complex.

Not all that is said about one group's views can necessarily be applied to other groups. However, an overview must be established and various teachings and attitudes tested by Scripture. I do not necessarily agree with the theological positions of some sources which I quote. In fact, I strongly disagree with some of them. However, I have tried to establish all pertinent facts with at least one or more other sources, each saying the same or similar things and then have chosen which stated the issue with the most clarity. Sincerely, Vicky Dillen

The Bible and the Talmud

"Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost."

What of the Bible? Is Scripture sufficient in itself and considered by the blip Roots ministries to be the inerrant Word of God? Are the Old and New Testament the complete revelation of God's will for the salvation of man. Do they constitute the divine and only rule of Christian faith and practice? Or is it true as stated by Peter Michas that we must return to the blip or Aramaic writings and the Oral traditions of Judaism for New Testament doctrine?

"since existing New Testament manuscripts are Greek, written to express Hebraic concepts, why be limited to the Greek or English translations when we have blip, The New Testament is in the pattern of the blipish traditional work of Torah, Mishnah, Haggadah, Halakah, Talmud and Midrash, but inspired by God Himself for the common people."

"These Hebraic works as well as the Inspired Scriptures were quoted from by Jesus and all the writers of the New Testament to have full comprehension, we must read the scriptures in the proper Hebraic context the New Testament is blip/Aramaic and not Greek or English in origin or thought Most all of the Judaic writings have been preserved for us and now translated into proper English directly from the blip, as well as explained in true Hebraic manner" 1.

In an email dated 1/19/99, James Trimm of the "Society for the Advancement of Nazarene Judaism" responded to questions regarding the sources of manuscripts for the Semitic New Testament Project (SNTP), on which he is working.

"It is such a delight to spend so much time buried in the text in its original language... The SNTP is based on blip and Aramaic rather than Greek manuscriptsthe Aramaic text makes much more sense than the Greek textThis is just one example from this project which I believe will revolutionize New Testament understanding"

"As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction."

Orthodox scholars agree that the New Testament was originally written in Greek.

"Despite the critical claim that Matthew wrote the gospel in Aramaic, this contention has never been proved. If there was an Aramaic original it disappeared at a very early age. The Greek gospel, which is now the Church's heritage, was almost beyond doubt written in Matthew's lifetime." 3.

"By whom the gospel of Matthew was given in our present Greek form is unknown, but probably by himself. The consensus of critical scholars is that it is not a mere translation but an original composition." 4.

Hyam Maccoby, grandson to the famous Rabbi Haim Zundel Maccoby, the Polish Kamenitzer Maggid, [spirit guide], expounds the view of Peter Michas and other blip Roots advocates that the Gospels were written in an era of extreme prejudice and hatred topiano coversds the blips and that this anti-Semitism was reflected in the New Testament. Hyam Maccoby impugns the accounts of Mark and Luke:

" the Gospel of Mark, the Gospel in which the lines of policy were laid down by the Gentile-Christian Church; a policy of condemnations of the blips as an accursed people."

"What had been the history of the Christian Church since the death of Jesus? The bulk of the New Testament which purports to give this history is The Acts of the Apostles; but this is a Gentile-Christian composition written about 100 A.D. by Luke, giving a Gentile-Christian slant to the events of those years. By reading between the lines of Acts, by following using a supplementary sources such as Josephus, the Talmud and early Christian historians, we can reconstruct the true history of the early church." 5.

"The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."

Error in the Bible

Other HR and related groups make the excuse that there is error in the Bible, which must be eliminated. Promoting their NEW Translation called "The Book of Yahweh," the House of Yahweh states this regarding the Scriptures,

" Many phrases have been deliberately mistranslated in order to hide their true meaning, so that Scripture would not bring to light the deceitful teaching of the established, and popular, religious organizations. The alteration of Yahweh's Scriptures, either by untranslating or mistranslating, has caused the True Work, which His Prophets spoke of, to be hidden in most translations of the Scriptures, and has been damaging to those who are searching the Scriptures for the way to Eternal Life."

"However, the most damaging error in all the Scriptures, was the error of removing YAHWEH'S NAME from the very scriptures He inspired to be written, and writing in its place the pagan titles of GODS, and SATAN HIMSELF! Because of this grave error, those who are calling upon the names of gods and Satan, even though ignorantly, are actually worshiping the gods and Satan—for they are not calling upon, and with, The NAME of YAHWEH!" 6.

"Through thy precepts I get understanding: therefore I hate every false way. Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path."

In his article, Explaining the Midrash, Jacob Prasch states that we need the knowledge of the Midrash and blipish thought to rightly understand the Bible.

"But Matthew appears to take the passage out of all reasonable context and twist it into talking about Jesus. We have to ask, is Matthew wrong? or is there something wrong with our Protestant way of interpreting the Bible? There is nothing wrong with Matthew, and there is nothing wrong with the New Testament. But there is something wrong with our Protestant mentalityThey were reading a blipish book as if it were a Greek book The first step is going back to reading the Bible as a blipish book, instead of as a Greek one." 7.

"Wisdom of the Ancients" bears an uneasy resemblance to Ancient Wisdom, which is the esoteric term used by occultists for Gnosis or Mysticism. William Kingsland wrote of this wisdom in his book, " THE GNOSIS OR ANCIENT WISDOM IN THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES: OR THE WISDOM IN A MYSTERY":

"...when I speak of the Gnosis, I do not refer specifically to the Greek or Coptic variety, but to that 'Ancient Wisdom' which can be discovered as a thread of gold running through allegories and myths and fables from the very earliest times of which we have any literary records, and which has more recently been somewhat more fully expounded to us by some of the existing Masters of that Wisdom." 9.

Are Christians unable to understand the Bible's teachings without this Ancient Wisdom?

"The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring forever: the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant piano coversned: and in keeping them there is great repiano coversd."

What about other sources of blipish thought regarding the Messiah, the kingdom of God, sin and salvation? How do teachings expounded from the "Ancient Wisdom" compare with the New Testament teachings? What differences may be found between the inspired Old and New Testament and the "Mishnah, Haggadah, Halakah, Talmud and Midrash?" Has the Holy Spirit equally inspired these sources?

Perhaps Peter Michas is correct in saying that we need to understand the original concepts from history and as they are taught now, particularly from these books and the blipish people themselves. Obviously, they would hold the keys to the blip Roots of Christianity as taught by the blipish sages.

Avi ben Mordechai, an Orthodox Sephardic blip, concurs with blip Roots teachers that the ancient blipish teachers of the Law hold the answers:

"Since Sha'ul followed Messiah Y'shua, who also taught the Oral and Written Torah, I submit (at this time in my life) that we should be following in the footsteps of Judaism's great teachers of G-d's Law, I believe that Judaism's ancient scholars and sages were far more knowledgeable on the Oral Traditions than we could ever hope to be." 10.

In other words, the rabbinical scholars are saying much the same thing as the leaders of the blip Roots/Messianic movements. According to these eminent scholars, the Bible is in error and insufficient in itself, and therefore not easily or correctly understood without the aid of select knowledge and insight from the written and oral traditions of the blip rabbis and scribes of old. Among the ancient blipish writings which we are urged to study, the Talmud is regarded by the blipish people as more important than even the Scriptures.

"That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God."

"If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him."

Primacy of theTalmud

Author, Nesta Webster quotes Talmud translator, Michael Rodkinson's view of the importance of the Talmud in blipish life:

She goes on to mention the lesser importance of Scripture given by the Talmud:

"The Talmud itself accords to the Bible only a secondary place. Thus the Talmudic treatise Soferim says: 'The Bible is like water, the Mischna is like wine, and the Gemarah is like spiced wine.'" 11.

One can verify these statements in the Talmudic treatise Soferim, in the tract Sopherim XV, 7, fol.13b. This teaching regarding the inferior status of the Bible is echoed in the tract Babha Metsia, fol. 33a:

"Those who devote themselves to reading the Bible exercise a certain virtue, but not very much; those who study the Mischnah exercise virtue for which they will receive a repiano coversd; those, however, who take upon themselves to study the Gemarah exercise the highest virtue. " 12.

The author, Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, reiterates the high esteem with which the Talmud and its writers are held, either placing it on a level with Scripture or surpassing it:

"In the tract Erubhin, f.13b, where it is related that there was a difference of opinion between the two schools of Hillel and Schamai, it is concluded that:

"Contemporary defenders of the Talmud speak of it almost in the same way." 13.

"The following is a well-known and highly praised opinion in the writings of the Rabbis:

"My son, give heed to the words of the scribes rather than to the words of the law."

"He who transgresses the words of the scribes sins more gravely than the transgressors of the words of the law." 14.

Baba Mezia 59b. A rabbi debates God and defeats Him. God admits the rabbi won the debate. 15.

Maimonides defines the various ways one would be considered a denier of the Law, referring not to the Bible, but the oral law as set down by the sages:

Rabbi Maimonides, in Hilkhoth Teschubhah (III, 8) gives the list of those who are considered as denying the Law: "There are three classes of people who deny the Law of the Torah: (1) Those who say that the Torah was not given by God, at least one verse or one word of it, and who say that it was all the work of Moses; (2) Those who reject the explanation of the Torah, namely, the Oral Law of the Mischnah, and do not recognize the authority of the Doctors of the Law, like the followers of Tsadok (Sadducees) and Baithos; (3) Those who say that God changed the Law for another New Law, and that the Torah no longer has any value, although they do not deny that it was given by God, as the Christians and the Turks believe. All of these deny the Law of the Torah." 16.

Scribes and Pharisees

Who are the scribes whose words or oral law must be listened to and obeyed above all the written law? Quoting again from Hyam Maccoby's, Revolution in Judaea, is the following explanation of the terms Pharisee, Sadducee, scribes and rabbis, at the time of Christ.

"These [the Pharisees] were the members of the body of ‘Comrades' (Haverim) as they called themselves. Their leaders were called ‘Wise Men' (Hahamin), and they were later given the title ‘Master" (Rabbi) before their names. These leaders were also sometimes known as the ‘Scribes' after the title of Ezra and his followers in late Biblical times. Pharisees, in fact, regarded Ezra as the founder of their movement, and they regarded themselves as the heirs of the Prophetic tradition." 17.

The term "Pharisee" was used at the time of Jesus, and eventually became replaced completely with "rabbi", who was often a lay teacher. Rabbi Maccoby explains the differences between the Pharisees and Sadducees at the time of Christ.

"The central religious distinction between the Pharisees and the Sadducees was on the question of the ‘Oral Law'. The Pharisees held that in addition to the revealed word of God in Scripture ( i.e. the Old Testament, as Christians later called, and especially the five books of Moses known as the Torah or ‘Teaching') there was an oral tradition consisting of interpretations and enactments supplementing and developing the Written Law." 18.

"The Sadducees, on the other hand, held that the whole of Judaism lay in the Written Law which was a closed and final revelation with no need of interpretation or development. The Sadducees, ...wanted to keep Judaism simple. The wanted it to be centered around three great institutions, the Scripture, the Priesthood, and the Temple" 19.

Maccoby goes on to develop the Pharisaical view of the Torah as a dynamic document, subject to new interpretations by themselves, according to the Oral Law:

" To the Pharisees, however, this policy was, in their own graphic phrase, ‘to put Torah into a corner'.[B.Kiddushin, 66a.(Talmud)] The Torah was to them, a living thing which must continually encounter and grapple with new circumstances, thus, giving rise to new decisions which became part of the developing Oral Law. This does not mean the Pharisees regarded the Bible as imperfect. It was the Word of God, revealed to Moses and the Prophets. But new circumstances were continually drawing out of it new depths of meaning; its content was inexhaustible. This growing knowledge of the possibilities of the Torah, revealed through time in the processes of history, was the Oral Law. In other words, the place of the Torah was ‘not in heaven, but in the hands of men'; [B.B.Metz, 59b. (Talmud)] and the Oral Law was thus the working, human reality of the divine revelation." 20.

"The Pharisees, however, always claimed that the Oral Law, of which they were supporters and champions, went back to the origins of Judaism and that the Sadducees, in denying the Oral Law, were heretics who were attempting to abolish a fundamental religious principle. " 21.

In the volume, Josephus, the historian also contrasts the views of the Pharisees and Sadducees regarding the Oral Law:

"the Pharisees have delivered to the people a great many observances by succession from their fathers, which are not written in the law of Moses; and it is for this reason that the Sadducees reject them, and say that we are to esteem those observances to be obligatory which are in the written word, and not to observe what are derived from the tradition of our forefathers. " 22.

In defense and support of the Pharisees, Hyam Maccoby adds this tribute to their preservation and multiplying of religious rituals and traditions:

"The Pharisees added new Festivals (Chanukah and Purim) to the blipish religious year; they added to the canon of Scripturethey added new doctrine to Judaismthey added new rites to the Temple worshipas well as being continual creators of new prayers and ceremonies in the synagogue." 23.

Indeed, the authority and respect attributed to rabbis is so great, that it is taught within the Babylonian Talmud, section Hagigah 27a., that no rabbi will go to hell.

The Pharisees and Sadducees were both believers in the word given by God to man, but the Pharisees added extra-Biblical oral teachings as authority over the written Word of God. They called the Sadducees heretics for not doing so. Those in the blip Roots movement parallel the Pharisees in that they look to these extra-Biblical works for their guidance---and wish all to follow suit.

"And Jesus answering said unto them, Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?"

Exclusiveness of the Talmud

Why would the leaders of the blip Roots, Nazarene movements want us to study the Talmud, and so on, when the Talmud itself teaches that its precepts are only for the blips??

" the Talmud is not a law of righteousness for all mankind, but a meticulous code applying to the blip alone ....In the Talmud and ... as Drach points out, "the precepts of justice, of equity, of charity topiano coversds one's neighbor, are not only not applicable with regard to the Christian, but constitute a crime in anyone who would act differently ... The Talmud expressly forbids one to save a non-blip from death, ...to restore lost goods, etc., to him, to have pity on him." 24.

The exclusiveness of the Talmud is commonly understood among the blips. In the footnote for these quotes it is noted that Drach was:

"Quoting the treatise Aboda-Zara, folio 13 verso, and folio 20 recto; also treatise Baba Kamna, folio 29 verso. Drach adds: "We could multiply these quotations to infinity"

"The blipish Encyclopædia has an article on Drach in which it says he was brought up in a Talmudic school" 25.

Furthermore, Rev. I. B. Pranaitis relates the Talmudic view of the Gospels and those who own them.

"In the Talmud those who possess books called the Gospels are heretics [Minim]. Thus in Schabbath (116a) it says: "Rabbi Meir calls the books of the Minim Aven Gilaion [iniquitous volumes] because they call them Gospels." 26.

What Scripture supports the idea that we must hold to blip thought that the Gospels are iniquitous and those who believe them are heretics? Is this what Larry Rowland means by "understanding in order to grasp all that scripture has to offer"? Is this oral tradition committed to the writings of the Talmud, to be embraced as truth and supporting what Christ himself taught?

"Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition."

"But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as trangressors."

Considering the great importance of the Talmud in blip thought and blip Roots teachings, we need to understand exactly what the Talmud is and what it contains.

The Talmud

Many involved in Judaism and the blip Roots movement embrace the idea that the Talmud is divinely inspired and of benefit to Christianity. In the past, not surprisingly, some blips have viewed the Talmud as an obstacle, preventing reconciliation between the groups.

We know that blip people do not consider the New Testament to be of God. However, Avi ben Mordechai redefines the gospel as the Oral Torah:

"When Paul says, "I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel" you need to see the definition of Gospel in light of the Mishnah of Mark 1:1ff. It's a direct connection to the Torah of Moshe- Oral and Written" 27.

It has been established that the oral traditions of the Pharisees, which were committed to the Talmud, take authority and precedence over the Old Testament as Judaism's holiest book. The Talmud contains material accumulated over several centuries. A complete collection consists of 63 books in 524 chapters. The main elements of the Talmud are the Mishna, the Gamera (Babylonian and Palestinian) and the Midrashim or Midrash. The Mishna and Gemara compose the JerBliplem Talmud, which was revised in the third to fifth century and later named the Babylonian Talmud, the one commonly used today. Credit is given to Rabbi Judah the Prince for the compilation of the Mishna around 200 A.D.

The Talmud itself confirms, again, the authority of the Talmud teachings in Erubin 21b (Soncino edition):

"My son, be more careful in the observance of the words of the Scribes than in the words of the Torah (Old Testament)." 28.

In Judaism on Trial, Hyam Maccoby quotes Rabbi Yehiel ben Joseph, who insists that it is indispensable to understanding Scripture:

"Further, without the Talmud, we would not be able to understand passages in the Bible...God has handed this authority to the sages and tradition is a necessity as well as scripture. The Sages also made enactments of their own... anyone who does not study the Talmud cannot understand Scripture." 29.

From Fabre d' Olivet, author of La Langue He'braique, we learn not only the true source of the blip Oral Tradition, which is Egypt, but its future transmission into the great body of blipish mysticism called the Kabbalah:

"According to Fabre d'Olivet, Moses, who was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, "drew from the Egyptian Mysteries a part of the oral tradition which was handed down through 'the leaders of the Isrealites."¹. That such an oral tradition, distinct from the written word embodied in the Pentateuch, did descend from Moses and that it was later committed in writing in the Talmud and the Cabala is the opinion of many blipish writers." ². 30.

From The Kabbalah in English, we may glean factual information about the blip Sacred books, whose Gnostic (hidden) meanings were later developed into the Kabbalah:

"But the Scripture alone can not show the meanings within. Rabbinic hermeneutics could find a wealth of meaning in the subtlest details of the text, a characteristic that Kabbalistic writing took over The Talmud is actually two works in one The core work is the Mishnah, a codification of blipish Law from the second century CE, together with transcriptions of debates, discussions, and teachings of various sages in the next two to three centuries, organized around the Mishnah, called the Gemara. The Talmud thus shares the same structure of the Mishnah--a tractate by tractate enunciation of blipish law; but, being in form the record of oral teaching, the Gemara wanders far and wide. There are two versions of the Gemara, based on the work of the Academies of Babylonia (Babylonian Talmud/Talmud Bavli) and blip (called the Palestinian Talmud or Talmud of the Land of blip; in blip the title is Talmud Yerushalmi, or JerBliplem Talmud). Not every tractate of the Mishnah accumulated a Gemara, and some tractates have Gemara in one recension but not the other the standard complete translation of the Bavli is that of Soncino Press, originally done in the 1930s The blip contains various commentaries normally printed with the Talmud, but these are not translated"31.

Regarding the Midrash, The Kabbalah in English, notes the legendary character of its content, and further explains the more important authors and their commentaries.

"The Midrash, stemming from the same period as the Talmud, but more concerned with supplying context and elaboration of the Biblical text. Much legendary material is archived here. Midrashim exist on the Torah, the books of Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Song of Songs (together referred to as the five Megillot), and Psalms. Usually all but the last are grouped together as Midrash Rabbah, and an multivolume translation from the Soncino Press is available"32.

"Ancillary to this is Rashi and Rambam. Rashi is Rabbi Shlomo ben Yitzchak, author of the most important, because most widespread, commentary on the Bible and the Talmud; even the most uneducated of blips in premodern times knew what Rashi said about a passage in the Bible, and his glosses are to be found on almost every page of the Talmud His commentary generally distills the Talmudic teaching, and draws on the Midrash heavily; and in turn lies at the foundation of many later commentators Rambam is Rabbi Moses ben Maimon (another acronym), usually called in English by his Greek name, Maimonides. He wrote the first definitive compilation of blipish law since Talmudic times, the Mishneh Torah, but for the student of Kabbalah it is the Guide for the Perplexed, Moreh Nebuchim" 33.

Peter Michas, Jacob Prasch and other teachers in the blip Roots Movement, also favour the Midrash. Hyam Maccoby notes that The Haggada of the Midrash is composed of blipish fables:

"The Haggada (found mainly in the Midrash) is the poetical side of Pharisaism, and comprises folktales, parables, quaint fancies and metaphysical speculations." 34.

"Not giving heed to blipish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."

blipish Education & 'Halacha"

Project Genesis, found at www.torah.org/info/genesis.html, is connected to such blip Roots sites as Larry Rowlands, Messengers of Truth. Part of its purpose includes education about blipish roots:

"Project Genesis promotes further blipish education about our blipish roots, as represented in blipish sources"

"Our teachers are Orthodox, so they approach the tradition from a traditional perspective (which is logical, after all). But our program so carefully avoids labels and politics that Conservative and Reform Rabbis have actively expressed their support of the program to their congregants and colleagues." 35.

One of their online Torah projects is the Hypertext Halacha, which is a translation of selections of the Mishna. The Hypertext Halacha:

"...is a translation of the Shulchan Aruch and Mishna Berurah as distributed by Project Genesis " 36.

The term Halacha is used frequently when discussing the Midrash, Mishnah and Talmudic teachings, and needs to be defined. According to one authority,

"Halacha means "Way" or "Path". Halacha is the application of the Law (Torah) to everyday living. The traditional viewpoint is that Halacha should be decided by those who are most knowledgable in all aspects of blipish law. Since the Halacha of each generation is decided by its greatest Torah scholars, and the Torah doesn't change, there is usually little change in the Halacha from one generation to the next. The development of Halacha is most evident when new situations arise for which rulings must be made, such as the destruction of the Temple, the development of electricity, and the increasing complexity of modern food processing technology. Since the non-traditional viewpoint is that the Torah itself was written by people, both the interpretation of the Law and its application are re-evaluated in each generation, using the interpretations of the past to serve primarily as non-binding guidance in how to continue this process. Both viewpoints encourages all blips to study halacha, and apply it to their daily lives in order that they be brought closer to G-d." 37.

The Halacha List Home page cites that the teachings of the Mishna Berurah (like Project Genesis) are provided with the intended aim, "to familiarize the general public with various Halachic situations which are relevant to our everyday life." 38.

With that in mind we see from the Hypertext Halacha, distributed by Project Genesis, a list of topics from these Sacred blipish books, relevant to everyday life. Just a small portion of these includes the following examples.

"Siman 11. The Laws of Tzitzis The Laws of the Tzitzis String, 12. Things that Invalidate Tzitzis [Fringes] Siman 20. Laws of Tzitzis in a Cemetary Siman 26. The Law for Someone Who Has Only One "Tifila" Siman 28. The Laws of taking off the Tefillin Siman 35. The Law Concerning the Number of Lines (in the Torah Passages of Tefilin) Siman 39. Which People are fit to write Tefilin and " Siman 43 The laws of tefilin when entering a bathroom(cont.) Siman 45 The Laws of Tefillin in a graveyard and bathhouse Siman 73 How one who sleeps with his wife and children should act Siman 75 One should be careful about [a woman's] uncovered hair and a woman's [singing] voice when reading the Shema, and also not to read it in the presence of nakedness Siman 76 To Be Careful of Excrement While Saying the Shema Siman 79 One who comes across excrement when reading the Shema (continued)Siman 89 The Laws of Prayer and Their Proper Time Siman 100 One must concentrate upon all of the blessings, and one can pray in any language [Shmoneh Esrei] Siman 103 Someone who needs to flatulate in the middle of praying. Siman 114 The law of mentioning wind, rain and dew." 39.

The blipish writer, Solomon Maimon, wrote in 1792, to expose what he called "absurd questions" which are discussed with utmost seriousness and explicit detail in the Talmud.

". . .the oddest rabbinical conceits are elaborated through many volumes with the finest dialectic, and absurd questions are discussed with the highest efforts of intellectual power: for example, how many white hairs may a red cow have, and yet remain a red cow; what sort of scabs require this or that purification; whether a louse or a flea may be killed on the Sabbath-the first being allowed, while the second is a deadly sin; whether the slaughter of an animal ought to be executed at the neck or the tail; whether the high priest put on his shirt or his hose first; whether the Jabam, that is, the brother of a man who died childless, being required by law to marry the widow, is relieved from his obligation if he falls off a roof and sticks in the mire." 40.

Global Unity and the Halacha

Avi ben Mordechai, an Orthodox Sephardic blip, indicates that we need to incorporate the blipish "halacha" teachings in order for "believers" to be unified globally. His intention is that blipish teachers and eventually a blipish high court should be in place in order to teach us the truth.

"As I see it today Nazerean (Messianic) halacha should be in place to help us as a global community of believers in Y'shua HaMashiach properly interpret the written code of Sinai for the community at-large. Not only is this good government (i.e., "the kingdom of G-d on earth") but this is also the commandment of Y'shua."

"The council in Acts Chapter 15 led by it Nasi (Prince) Ya'acov HaTzadeq (James) and his Av Bet Din (Father of the House of Judgment) Kefa (Peter), was built on Y'shua's Mishnah and Gemara and on the principle that biblical blipish government must include the halachic jurisdiction of a Bet Din or high court ( Mattityahu 18). Consequently, I believe we have the responsibility and privilege to establish another authority like the one recorded in Acts 15, and ideally, it should be seated in Y'rushalayim! "

" first century halacha is not what it used to be. Furthermore, since there is no official high court to represent the halachic interests of believers in Y'shua, what are we to do with our own disputes, judgments, and need for legal rulings? Do we turn to the established traditions of the Sephardim? [Kabbalists] The Asheblipm? [Mystics] The Conservatives or some other body of Judaism?

I believe that Judaism's ancient scholars and sages were far more knowledgeable on the Oral Traditions than we could ever hope to be. So, what do we do? Where do we stand today since we do not have our own high court and have not had one for nearly two millennia?" 41.

Both the Sephardim and the Ashkeblipm are gnostic sects of Judaism. The Sephardim are credited with the dissemination of the Cabala throughout Europe after the blips were expelled from Spain.

On the website http://watch.pair.com/blip.html#latin is posted an Ecumenical News report that the Chief Rabbis of blip, who are of the Sephardim and Ashkeblipm, have entered into a dialogue with the Vatican to accomplish global unity.

Since the Talmud is considered to be superior to the Bible, it behooves us to know what things it teaches about the foundations of our Christian beliefs. Since we are admonished we are not able to understand the Word of God without it and we need to be taught by blipish sages, that is to whom we will turn, to see what is believed and taught.

"For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent."

* Peter Michas, http://www.ez/com/~peterm/HB.GK.RF.HTML
* Fitzmeyer, "Responses to 101 Questions on the Dead Sea Scrolls; p.104 ; as cited in Andrew Goulds SOME DISTURBING ASPECTS OF THE SO-CALLED "blip ROOTS' MOVEMENT, AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS"
* Unger's Bible Dictionary p. 706, Ibid.
* Ibid p.422 Ibid.
* Hyam Maccoby; "Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the blipish Resistance"; p. 230, ii. Ocean Books; 1973
* House of Yahweh, www.yahweh.com
* Jacob Prasch; Explaining the Midrash; www.cw.co.za/moriel/midrash.html]
* Ibid.
* Kingsland, William. THE GNOSIS OR ANCIENT WISDOM IN THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES: OR THE WISDOM IN A MYSTERY; London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1954 (1937), Kingsland, p.83
* Avi ben Mordechai; www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm
* Michael Rodkinson (i.e. Rodkinssohn), in Preface to the translation of the Talmud, Vol. I. p. x. ; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, p. 370-371., "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements" Omni Publications, Eighth edition, 1964
* Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians; The Talmud; holypiano covers.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
* Ibid.
* Ibid.
* Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, The Campaign for Radical Truth in History; http://www.hoffman-info.com
* Pranaitis, op.cit.
* Maccoby, op.cit., p.77-78
* Ibid., p. 74
* Ibid., p.74-75
* Ibid., p.75
* Ibid., p..76
* Ibid., p.77
* Ibid., p.281
* P.L.B. Drach, De l'Harmonie entre l'Elise et la Synagogue, I. 167. Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op. cit. p.371
* Webster, Ibid., p.11-12
* Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; holypiano covers.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
* Avi ben Mordechai, email to Ed Tarkowski, May 1998
* Michael A. Hoffman II & Alan R. Critchley, op. cit.
* Ibid.
* 1. Fabre d' Olivet, La Langue He'braique, p.28 (1815); 2. According to the blipish view God had given Moses on Mt. Sinai alike the oral and the written Law, that is, the Law with all it's interpretations and applications."-Alfred Edersheim, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah,I.99 (1883)quoting other blipish authorities; as Cited in Nesta H. Webster; Ibid., p.6
* Kabbalah in English, http://remus.rutgers.edu/~woj/arcana/index.html * Ibid.
* Ibid.
* Maccoby, op.cit., p. 281
* Project Genesis, http://www.torah.org/info/genesis.html
* Hypertext Halacha; http://www.torah.org/learning/halacha/
* Torah and Halachic Authority (3/12) - What is "Halacha?" How is it determined?; http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/text/faq/usenet-faqs/html/judaism/FAQ/03-Torah-Halacha/faq-doc-45.html
* http://www.virtualjerBliplem.com/city_services/lists/halacha/index.htm
* Hypertext Halacha; http://www.torah.org/learning/halacha/
* Solomon Maimon: an Autobiography, translated from the German by J. Clark Murray, p. 28 (1888). The original appeared in 1792. As Cited in: Webster ; op.cit. p. 7
* Avi ben Mordechai, Halacha; www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm

To Embrace blip Roots: III

The Talmud and Jesus Christ

Since we are asked to embrace the teachings of the Talmud and various other writings of the blip people, we should start by inquiring as to what these teach about our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

"He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself; he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. And this is the record, that God hath given us eternal life; and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life; and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God."

From a blipish article about Jesus we learn that the Talmud slanders our Savior, Jesus Christ.

"... the blipish Encyclopœdia admits that blipish legends concerning Jesus are found in the Talmud and Midrash and in " the life of Jesus ( Toledot Yeshu) that originated in the Middle Ages. It is the tendency of all these sources to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing to Him illegitimate birth, magic, and a shameful death. " 1.

"… He [Jesus] is referred to in the Talmud as Otho Isch- "That man," i.e. the one who is known to all. In the tract Abhodah Zarah, 6a, we read: "He is called a Christian who follows the false teachings of that man, who taught them to celebrate the feast on the first day of the Sabbath, that is, to worship on the first day after Sabbath…Talui, -"The one who was hanged"…" 2.

Many people believe that the name for Jesus in blip is Jeschua or Yeshua. However, the complete,

"…name in blip would be Jeschua Hanotsri--Jesus the Nazarene. He is called Notsri from the city of Nazareth… In the Talmud Christians are also called Notsrim. (Amongst other things). 'Since the word Jeschua means 'Savior,' the name Jesus rarely occurs in the blipish books. It is almost always abbreviated to Jeschu…"3.

"…as if it were composed of the initial letters of the three words Immach SCHemo Vezikro-- (meaning)- -'May his name be blotted out.'" 4.

blip Roots proponents might say that these teachings are in the past. However, a review of various sources reveals the same or similar teachings.

The Talmud and Cabala teachings of the Toledot Yeshu-- (or Tolodoth Ieschu or Sepher Toldoth Jehoshua) represent various teachings regarding Christ, which may be shocking to many. A brief overview of these teachings refers to writings that quote the Talmud, (treatise Sabbath, folio 104, treatise Sanhedrim, folio 107, and Sota, folio 47) which presents this falsified account of Jesus:

"...the Toledot Yeshu relates with the most indecent details that Miriam, a hairdresser of Bethlehem,4. affianced to a young man named Jochanan, was seduced by a libertine, Joseph Panther or Pandira, and gave birth to a son whom she named Johosuah or Jeschu. According to the Talmudic authors of the Sota and the Sanhedrim, Jeschu was taken during his boyhood to Egypt, where he was initiated into the secrets doctrines of the priests, and on his return to blip gave himself up to the practice of magic. 5. The Toledot Yeshu, however, goes on to say that on reaching manhood, Jeschu learnt the secret of his illegitimacy, on account of which he was driven out of the Synagogue and took refuge for a time in Galilee."

"Now, there was in the Temple a stone on which was engraved the Tetragrammaton [YHWH] or Schem Hamphorasch, that is to say, the Ineffable Name of God; this stone had been found by King David when the foundations of the Temple were being prepared and was deposited by him in the Holy of Holies. Jeschu, knowing this, came from Galilee and, penetrating into the Holy of Holies, read the Ineffable name, which he transcribed on to a piece of whom parchment and concealed in an incision under his skin. By this means he was able to work miracles and to persuade the people that he was the son of God foretold by Isaiah. With the aid of Judas, the Sages of the Synagogue, succeeding in capturing Jeschu, who was then lead before the Great and Little Sanhedrim, by whom he was condemned to be stoned to death and finally hanged." Such is the story of Christ according to the blipish Kabbalists ..." 5.

This false witness to the person of Jesus in the Talmud is also confirmed by Rev. I. B. Pranaitis in his online report, The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians, and other sources" 6.

Another Jesus?

In his article, "Some Disturbing Aspects of the So-called 'blip Roots' Movement and Their Implications" Andrew Gould presents the blip Roots doubtful view concerning the validity of the Gospel account of Jesus.

"…It has been widely accepted in "blip Roots" circles that Jesus spoke blip and that the Gospels were originally written in blip. Most "blip Roots" ministries have been influenced in this notion by the output of a body called the JerBliplem School Of Synoptic Research, [JSSR] and most especially due to the widespread influence of the book "Understanding The Difficult Words Of Jesus" published by David Bivin (Director of the JSSR) and his partner Roy Blizzard. in 1984 and reprinted in 1994 and 1995…" 7.

According to the JSSR, there is a more authentic Life of Jesus than the gospel accounts:

"… There was an original blip 'Life of Jesus', from parts of which our canonical Greek Gospel Texts are mere compilations and translations. The individual words of the Greek texts that we have are standard Greek equivalents used to translate blip documents into Greek, therefore we can retranslate back into blip to discover what Jesus really said. Failure to appreciate the Hebraic origins of the Gospels has led to mistranslation, mis interpretation, spiritually damaging error and doctrinal confusion." 8.

"Toledot Yeshu", with its various components, is one of the blip or blipish views of Jesus for those who rejected him as God come in the flesh. It has been established that the original manuscripts for the New Testament were composed in Greek. If one accepts blipish thought regarding who Jesus was according to Judaic writings and teachings, then Jesus was not divine. It is also conveyed that He was not viewed as divine by his disciples, but was viewed as the human Messiah. This subject will be pursued in the next section on blipish Thought.

Sir James Frazer, author of The Golden Bough, mentions that to cast doubts on the historical reality of Jesus, would be hardly less absurd than it would be to doubt Mohammed and so on. Other historians reiterate that the existence of Christ is an historic fact. However, Rene' Guenon,"who writes with inside knowledge" of Theosophy in Le Theosophisme (1921), cites a reference to the occultic Le Lotus of 1887 which states that Jesus Christ of the New Testament never existed, but the Jesus of the Talmud did exist:

"... Madam Blavatsky's writings, on the person of Christ, ... 'For me, Jesus Christ, that is to say the Man-God of the Christians, copy of the Avatars of all countries, of the Hindu Chrishna as of the Egyptian Horus, was never a historical personage.' Hence the story of His life was merely an allegory founded on the existence of the 'a personage named Jehoshua born at Lud.' But elsewhere she asserted that Jesus may have lived during the Christian era or a century earlier 'as the Sepher Toldoth Jehoshua indicates.'

"And Madame Blavatsky went on to say of the savants who deny the historical value of this legend, that they- 'either lie or talk nonsense. It is our Masters who affirm it. If the history of Jehoshua or Jesus Ben Pandera is false, then the whole of the Talmud, the whole of the blipish canon law, is false. It was the disciple of Jehoshua ben Parachai, the fifth blip of the Sanhedrin since Ezra, who re-wrote the Bible .... This story is much truer than that of the New Testament, of which history does not say a word." 9.

Is it possible that Jehoshua Ben Pandera of the Toledot Yeshu of the Talmud, who was initiated into the secrets doctrines and gave himself up to the practice of magic, is Jehoshua or Yeshua whom the blip Roots ministries worship?

The following is a portion of an e-mail exchange dated 1/28/99 between the writer and Uri Marcus of Nehemiah Trustee Covenant Fund:

From the La Science des Esprits, by the 19th century occultist, Eliphas Levi, we learn that the Cabalistic Toledot Yeshu and similar Talmudic teachings were purposely hidden from Christians.

"…the Toledot Yeshu, or the Sepher Toldos Jeschu, described here as originating in the Middle Ages…belongs in a much earlier period. Eliphas Levi asserts that 'the Sepher Toldos, to which the blips attribute a great antiquity and which they hid from the Christians with such precautions that this book was for a long while unfindable, is quoted for the first time by Raymond Martin of the Order of the Preaching Brothers… This book was evidently written by a Rabbi initiated into the mysteries of the Cabala 1.'" 10.

History reveals that The Talmud itself was put on trial and ordered to be burned, by King Louis IX in June of 1242, because of the various slanders against Christ, and Christianity. It was stated that The Talmud contained such things as it being acceptable to deceive a Christian without any scruple; that it was permitted to break a promise, and so on.

The stories contained in Toledot Yeshu and similar teachings were known in blipish circles, but did not come into the hands of 'Gentiles' or 'Christians' until Raymond Martin translated the Toledot Yeshu into Latin. Later, Martin Luther summarized it in German under the name Schem Hamphorasch and his expose can be found in French in Gustave Brunet's, Evangiles Apocryphes. 11.

According to Geschichte der Juden, by blipish historian Heinrich Graetz, the image of Jesus Christ is simply as an offshoot of Essenism and Jesus was just performing what any adept in the mysteries could do.

"…Thus the blipish historian Graetz declares that Jesus simply appropriated to himself the essential features of Essenism, and that primitive Christianity was "nothing but an offshoot of Essenism"2" 12a.

". . . So after representing Christ as a magician in the Toledot Yeshu and the Talmud, blipish tradition seeks to explain His miraculous works as those of a mere healer-an idea that we shall find descending right through the secret societies to this day… if the miracles of Christ were simply due to a knowledge of natural laws and His doctrines were the outcome of a sect, the whole theory of His divine power and mission falls to the ground…" 12.

Many sources state that when the teachings regarding Jesus Christ in the Toledot Yeshu and other blipish books were discovered in the early 1600's, there were serious repercussions. A blipish synod in Poland in 1631, ordered the offending passages to be expunged, to be replaced by circles which the Rabbis were to fill in orally when giving instructions to young blips. This is documented by P.L.B Drach:

"Drach, op.cit. I.168, 169. The text of this encyclical is given in blip and also in translation, thus: " This is why we enjoin you, under the pain of excommunication major, to print nothing in future editions, whether of Mischna or of the Gemara, which relates whether for good or evil to the acts of Jesus the Nazarene, and to substitute instead a circle like this O, which will piano coversn the Rabbis and schoolmasters to teach the young these passages only viva voce. By means of this precaution the savants amongst the Nazarenes will have no further pretext to piano help us on this subject. Cf, Abbe'Chiarini, Le Talmud de Babylone, p. 45 (1831)." 13.

These passages are said to have been reinserted since then, although the such offensive passages would not necessarily be in any English translations or newer editions. 14.

These then, are some of the blip Roots - a significant part of which are the teachings and thought within the Talmud regarding our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Some might say, that the views presented from the past regarding Jesus Christ do not apply today, or have no effect on our studying blipish tradition, teachings or thought within the blip Roots movement. That perhaps, the above information is no longer taught. We must ask ourselves, then, what was and is today, blipish thought regarding the Messiah, salvation, sin, the Son of God, and the divinity of Christ? Do these blipish terms mean the same as what we think?

John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me."

Acts 4:10 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved."

In his volume, The Talmud, Joseph Barclay confirmed the writings of Drach, a talmudist turned Catholic whose writings were never refuted by blips, that Jesus was a sorcerer:

" … Abominable calumnies on Christ and Christianity occur not only in the Cabala but in the earlier editions of the Talmud. In these, says Barclay - "Our Lord and savior is "that one", "such an one", "a fool", "the leper", "the deceiver of blip", etc. Efforts are made to prove that He is the son of Joseph Pandira before His marriage with Mary. His miracles are attributed to sorcery the secret of which He brought in a slit in His flesh out of Egypt. He is said had been first stoned and then hanged on the eve of the Passover. His disciples are called heretics and opprobious names. They are accused of immoral practices, and the New Testament is called a sinful book. The references to these subjects manifest the most bitter aversion and hatred." 15.

blipish and Christian Terms

Knowing that there is much diversity of thought inside Judaism with four [some say three, under different terms] basic groups: Orthodoxy, Conservative, Reform, and Reconstructionist Judaism, it is difficult to present their respective ideas as being i agreement with one another. However, there are some underlying beliefs that appear to remain constant and accepted by most blips regarding Christ, the Messiah, salvation, sin, and so on.

Jesus and Messiah

Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, considered a Conservative blip, explains some of today's thinking pertaining to "The Differences between Judaism and Christianity":

In "THE blipISH VIEW OF JESUS", Dr. Epstein gives Jesus credit for being a good teacher, but not God:

"To Christians, the central tenet of their religion is the belief that Jesus is the Son of God, part of the trinity, the savior of souls who is the messiah. He is God's revelation through flesh. Jesus was, in Christian terms, God incarnate, God in the flesh who came to Earth to absorb the sins of humans and therefore free from sin those who accepted his divinity. To blips, whatever wonderful teacher and storyteller Jesus may have been, he was just a human, not the son of God (except in the metaphorical sense in which all humans are children of God). In the blipish view, Jesus cannot save souls; only God can. Jesus did not, in the blipish view, rise from the dead." 16.

The "blips for Judaism" web site explains Jesus as a false prophet predicted in the Old Testament.

"…Jesus the Nazarene, who imagined that he would be messiah and was killed, is alluded to in the book of Daniel, as it is said, `And the sons of the transgressors among thy people will rise, in order to establish a vision, and will stumble' (Dan. 11:14). Can there be a greater stumbling then this? All the prophets said that messiah will be a redeemer and a savior to the bliptes, will bring together their outcasts, and will strengthen their obedience to the Divine precepts, but he (Jesus) caused destruction by the sword to blip, the dispersion of those left, and their humiliation. He changed the law, and misled many people to worship a being beside G-D…." 17.

Rabbi Hyam Maccoby, in Revolution in Judaea, written in 1973 and still proclaimed accurate today, defines the blipish view of Messiah as an anointed one, and angel or king, but not divine:

"The title "Messiah' (Greek-Christos) was not a divine title among the blips. It simply means ' anointed'. It was given to two blipish officials, King and the High Priest… every blipish king of the house of David was known as Messiah, or Christ…" 18.

"The 'Son of Man', was not a Messiah. He was an angel identified with the Guardian Angel of blip, with Metatron, with the angel who guided the Children of blip in the wilderness…" 19.

"…There is hardly any reference in the Prophetic writings of the Old Testament to the Messiah as a person. There is no splendid shining figure judging mankind, sitting at the right-hand of God and coming very near to eclipsing God Himself by His glory." 20.

"Messiah…in blipish eyes, belonged to royalty, not divinity. Even the title 'Son of God" was to blips (but not to the Gnostics) a human title applied at various times in the blip Scriptures to Kings such as King David…"Son of Man" also was not a divine title…far better known as a mode of address to a prophet…to mean simply 'human being'." 21.

The "blips for Judaism" web site explains the historical "blipish Belief in Messiah," from the Mishna (Torah) by Maimonides:

"... In his monumental work Mishneh Torah, Maimonides (1135-1204) spelled out the fundamental blipish concept of the messiah as it was handed down to us, generation after generation, from the time of the prophets…"

"…from the Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim XI - XII. The King Messiah will in some future time come, restore the kingdom of David to its former power, build the Temple, bring together the scattered of blip, and all the ancient laws will again be in force. Sacrifices will be offered, and years of release and Jubilees will be kept as prescribed in the Torah. Whoever does not believe in him, or does not hope for his coming, shows a lack of faith not only in the prophets, but also in the Torah…" 22.

Many blips have believed there would be many Messiahs. At the time of Christ, Hyam Maccoby states:

"… Any leader who succeeded in driving out the Romans and setting up an independent blipish state would have little difficulty in being recognized as the Messiah. His very success would prove his claim. Thus Bar Kochba was recognized as the Messiah by Rabbi Akiva even though there was no evidence of his descent from David." 23.

>From the blipish Guardian of 1924, we read that the great messianic prophecy, Isaiah 53, refers to the sufferings of blip, rather than Christ:

"… an article in the blipish Press,… according to the teaching of the "Liberal blipish Synagogue," the beautiful passages in the fifty-third chapter of Isaiah concerning " the Man of Sorrows acquainted with grief, "usually supposed by Christians to relate to the promised Messiah, are interpreted to modern blipish youth as relating to blip and signifying that blip's " sufferings were caused by the sins of other nations," who thus "escaped the suffering they deserved." Consequently, "blip was offered for the sake of the whole world.2. " 24.

Messiah and Peace

According to Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, current blipish teaching excludes Jesus because it is unanimously believed that the Messiah will bring peace:

"Jesus is not seen as the messiah. In the blipish view, the messiah is a human being who will usher in an era of peace. We can tell the messiah by looking at the world and seeing if it is at peace. From the blipish view, this clearly did not happen when Jesus was on Earth or anytime after his death." 25.

Hyam Maccoby considers Jesus to be a rebel, but misrepresented by the gospel accounts out of fear of reprisals by Rome:

"…Jesus was executed as a rebel, against Rome, not as a blasphemer against the blipish religion, and that the Gospel's misrepresentations on this point are politically motivated--I regard as strongly established…" 26.

Hyam Maccoby, author, is considered a classical scholar and Rabbi of Reform Judaism, and has in recent years been director of the library at the Leo Baeck College of Judaistics in London. His books appear to present accepted ideas regarding Christ, Christianity and the New Testament and the blipish thought. Clarifying the various blipish thought and Christian misconceptions redefines Jesus' mission:

"…The phrase 'the kingdom of God'…meant the reign of God (not His heavenly territory) and referred to a projected return to a blipish system of theocracy…" 27.

"….He [Jesus] had campaigned among 'the lost sheep of blip', calling them to repentance, because he felt that the coming of God's Kingdom was being held back by blip's sin's. Pharisee writings often stress that God's promises to blip are not automatically fulfilled; they depend on blip's worthiness and co-operation ... " 28.

"…Jesus' mission as a prophet was exclusively directed topiano coversds the blips, not topiano coversds the Gentiles. The idea that Jesus rejected the blips and transferred the Old Testament 'promises' to the Gentiles was a later invention of the Gentile-Christian Church…" 29.

"… Some believed that the Messiah would inaugurate a new era for the whole world; that the nations of the world would acknowledge the One God and his Temple in JerBliplem; that the blips would be revered as the chosen priests of the One God; and that an era of world peace would begin when, in the words of Isaiah's wonderful internationalist vision, the swords would be beaten into plowshares and the wolf would lie down with lamb. Some, however, did not believe that the coming of the Messiah would necessarily bring about an era of international peace. There might be many Messiahs - many more sorrows and comfortings, defeats and victories - for the blipish people before that happened. After all, there had been Messiahs before and none had brought everlasting peace. The vision of Isaiah was acknowledged by every Pharisee, as the word of God but it was not necessarily attached to the expectation of the coming Messiah who would defeat the Romans." 30.

J.P Stehaln in "The Traditions of the blips", from the Talmud, (treatises Baba Bathra folio 74b, Pesachim folio 32, Bekhoroth folio 57 and Massektoth Ta'anith folio 31) presents a glorious scenario of the Messianic era - without Jesus Christ as the Messiah:

"… when the Messianic era arrives. After the return of the blips from all nations and parts of the world… the Messiah, we are told in the Talmud, will entertain them at a gorgeous banquet, where they will be seated at tables and regaled with wine from Adam's wine-cellar. The first course is to consist of a roasted ox named Behemoth, so immense that every day it eats up the grass upon a thoBlipnd hills; the second of a monstrous fish Leviathan; the third of a female Leviathan boiled and pickled; the fourth of a gigantic roast fowl known as Barjuchne, of which the egg alone was so enormous that when it fell out of the nest it crushed three hundred tall cedars and the white overflowed threescore villages. This course is to be followed up by "the most splendid and pompous Dessert," that can be procured, including fruit from the Tree of Life and "the Pomegranates of Eden which are preserved for the Just."

"At the end of the banquet "God will entertain the company at a ball"; He Himself will sit in the midst of them, and everyone will point Him out with his finger, saying: "Behold, this is our God: we have waited for Him, we will be glad and rejoice in His salvation." 31.

Sin and Salvation

>From "The Differences between Judaism and Christianity, we see the great partition between blipish and Christian thought on sin confirmed.

"Judaism does not accept the notion of original sin, the idea that people are bad from birth and cannot remove sin by themselves but need an act of grace provided by the sacrificial death of Jesus as atonement for all of humanity's sins. For Christians, there are no other forms of salvation other than through Jesus." 32.

Dr. Epstein goes on to explain that blipish thought about Sin and atonement. The sinner may seek forgiveness from God through human works:

"He [Jesus] also did not absorb the sins of people. For blips, sins are removed not by Jesus' atonement but by seeking forgiveness. blips seek forgiveness from God for sins against God and from other people (not just God) for sins against those people. Seeking forgiveness requires a sincere sense of repenting but also seeking directly to redress the wrong done to someone. Sins are partially removed through prayer which replaced animal sacrifice as a way of relieving sins. They are also removed by correcting errors against others. " 33.

"... There was no concept of a Suffering Messiah who would die on the cross to purge mankind of sin…. To the blips salvation was a physical not a purely spiritual concept. The Messianic age, to the blips, was to be the culmination of human history on earth. 34.

Also, regarding prayer Maccoby believes that it is possible for man to approach God in a sinless condition:

"…The belief in the efficacy of prayer was very strong among the Pharisees…. Only the most concerted beam of concentration, directed from Gethsemane to God, could obliterate the traces of the sins of blip, and bring about the hour of redemption. Jesus alone was not sufficient…This explains why Jesus narrowed down his company to the Twelve on that night. He wanted the company of those on whom he could most rely, for the power of sinless prayer would be far more important than the strength of mere number." 35.

Heaven and Hell

The writings of Dr. Epstein present the blips' overly spiritualized and less severe view of the afterlife:

"...Traditionalists gave the name Gehenna to the place where souls were punished. Many blipish thinkers noted that since, essentially, God is filled with mercy and love, punishment is not to be considered to be eternal. There are, similarly, many varying conceptions of paradise, such as that paradise is the place where we finally understand the true concept of God. It is also possible that there is no separate Heaven and Hell, only lesser or greater distance from God after death. In addition, punishment might be self-determined on the basis of suffering in kind the suffering the person brought about. That is, Judaism doesn't have a clear sense of Heaven and Hell, with different places in Hell for different punishments. Rather, the idea is that God uses the afterlife to provide ultimate justice and for the wicked to seek some sort of final redemption." 36.

Romans 6:20-23: "For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness. What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? For the end of those things is death. But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life. For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." blips 9:27: And as it is appointed unto man once to die, but after this the judgment.

Oneness Doctrine & the Trinity

Dr. Epstein summarizes the blipish doctrine of "oneness" as opposed to the "Trinity" or Christian doctrine of three Persons in one God.

"Judaism insists on a notion of monotheism, the idea that there is one God. As Judaism understands this idea, God cannot be made up of parts, even if those parts are mysteriously united. The Christian notion of trinitarianism is that God is made up of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Such a view, even if called monotheistic because the three parts are, by divine mystery, only one God, is incompatible with the blipish view that such a division is not possible. The blipish revolutionary idea is that God is one. This idea allows for God's unity and uniqueness as a creative force. Thus, for blips, God is the creator of all that we like and all that we don't. There is no evil force with an ability to create equal to God's. Judaism sees Christianity's trinitarianism as a weakening of the idea of God's oneness." 37.

Peter Michas, of Messengers of Messiah, asserted in an email discussion this belief in the "oneness" doctrine.

"… Yet the minute I saw the blip thinking of the oneness and the rest of it, it was never unclear to me again." 38.

In his book, THE ROD OF AN ALMOND TREE IN GOD'S MASTER PLAN, Peter. Michas expands upon his approval of the blip viewpoint of God and the Trinity.

"The unity of Yeshua HaMashiach with God the Father and the Holy Spirit has never been clearly understood from the doctrine of the Trinity..." 39.

"To understand the true relationship of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, it is essential to preserve the concept of oneness..." 40.

"The aspect of the Father may be simply understood as the Will of God. The aspect of the Son may be understood as the Word of God. The aspect of the Spirit of the Holy One may be understood as the Power of God..." 41

"To say God is three 'persons' opens the door to misunderstanding God. God is Spirit and cannot be reduced to the concept of a person..." 42.

"The Spirit of the Holy One is the very essence of the power of God the Father and not some separate entity." 43.

Peter Michas refers to the Godhead as three "aspects" and the Holy Spirit as an "essence" rather than a Person. It is already established by the blipish people themselves that the blip teachings reject the doctrine of three Persons in one God. They do not believe God would manifest in the flesh as Jesus Christ nor do they believe that He is God. Their oneness doctrine is that there cannot be a Father, Son and Holy Spirit, which means the rejection of Jesus Christ as divine Savior and Lord.

There is no Trinity concept in Judaism, unless, however, one embraces the blipish Kabbalah.

"M. Vulliaud quotes Isaac Meyer's assertion that, "the triad, of the ancient Cabala is Kether, the Father; Binah, the Holy Spirit or the Mother; and Hochmah, the Word or the Son." But in order to avoid the sequence of the Christian Trinity this arrangement has been altered in the modern Cabala of Luria and Moses of Cordovero, etc." 44.

The blipish Encyclopœdia clarifies that the Cabalistic trinity is not to be confused with Christianity.

"... The blipish Encyclopœdia…goes on to say that what appears to be Christian in the Cabala is only esoteric doctrine." 45.

2 John 7 : "For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist."

2 John 9: "Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son."

Christians & the Chosen People

blipish people characterise Christians in terms different from what we may think.

"… He said to go out into all the world (as you go) and make talmidim of all the goyim. …we are His talmidim or students of His Oral Traditions which is the proper definition of the term "Gospel." We are to follow His Mishnah and Gemara, i.e., His Talmud, and take it to the goyim, teaching them to observe all that He commanded us!…" 46.

Isn't this precisely the ministry of Peter Michas, Jacob Prasch and other blip Roots teachers: taking the Talmud to the goyim. The term "goyim" which Mr. Mordechai uses needs to be understood in its historical context. Citing information from the Kabbalistic book, the Zohar, a part of the blipish mysticism which Avi ben Mordechai teaches, we note:

"… the Chosen People…forms the basis of all Talmudic and Cabalistic writings. …According to the Zohar, "All bliptes will have a part in the future world," and on arrival there will not be handed over like the goyim (or non-blipish races) to the hands of the angel Douma and sent down to Hell.5. Indeed the goyim are even denied human attributes." 47.

According to The Emek ha Melek, the work of the Cabalist Naphtali, a disciple of Luria, the goyim are of the devil:

"…Thus the Zohar again explains that the words of the Scripture "Jehovah Elohim made man", mean that He made blip. 6. The seventeenth-century Rabbinical treatise Emek ha Melek observes: " Our Rabbis of blessed memory have said: "Ye blips are men because of the soul ye have from the Supreme Man (i.e, God). But the nations of the world are not styled men because they have not, from the Holy and Supreme Man, the Neschama (or glorious soul) but they have the Nephesch (soul) from Adam Belial, that is the malicious and unnecessary man, called Sammael, the Supreme Devil." 7" 48.

Another way of saying or spelling goyim, is Goi. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis, in his online work, The Talmud Unmasked, notes that this term has been removed from recent editions:

"Goi - Race, or people. The blips also call a man a Goi - a gentile; they call a gentile woman a Goiah. ... It is mostly applied to non-blips, or idolators. In blipish books which treat of Idolatry, worshippers of idols are often called by this single word Goi. For this reason, in more recent editions of the Talmud the use of the word Goi is purposely avoided and other words for non-blips are substituted.

It is well known that in the blipish language, the blips call Christians among whom they live, Goim. Nor do the blips deny this.

Sometimes in their popular magazines they say that this word means nothing harmful or evil. But the contrary can be seen in their books written in the blip language. For instance, in Choschen Hammischpat (34, 22), the name Goi is used in a depraved sense:

Indeed the whole idea of gentiles or "goyim" studying the blipish oral law as suggested by Jacob Prasch, Peter Michas, Avi ben Mordechai and others, is in direct disobedience to the proclamations in the Talmud. Even a Christian who is found studying the Law of blip merits death. Sanhedrin (59a) states:

"Rabbi Jochanan says: A Goi who pries into the Law is guilty to death. "Even a Christian who is found studying the Law of blip merits death."

It seems very perplexing indeed that leaders of the blip Roots movement would direct our thoughts to the teachings of the sages in the Talmud, Mishna and Midrash, when these same sages have been teaching the blipish people to destroy the writings of the Christians including the New Testament.

"Shabbath 116a. blips must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament."

Christian blips

The organization, blips for Judaism, "the Worlds foremost countermissionary organization", insinuates that the blips are not fooled by Christians who assume a blipish image to proselytize them. Even blips recognize the great divide between Judaism and Christianity.

"… Though blip Christianity claims to be a form of Judaism, it is not… It deceptively uses the sacred symbols of blipish observance (i.e. community Passover seders, menorahs, messianic services, etc.) as a cover to convert blips to Christianity, a belief system antithetical to Judaism… blip Christianity is not a form of Judaism and its members, even if they are of blipish birth, cannot be considered members of the blipish community. blip Christians are in radical conflict with the communal interests and the destiny of the blipish people. They have crossed an unbreachable chasm by accepting another religion. …"

"… practice of any other religious tradition has been understood to lead to the loss of rights to full participation in the blipish community…Our history has clearly shown that when confronted with a group of blips which has adopted another faith and seeks to convert others, we must stand firm in asserting that this other faith is not Judaism and that its adherents have forfeited their privileges as blips. blipish tradition believes that the opportunity to return to participation in the blipish community is always open. When this occurs, all privileges are restored." 50.

This repudiation of those who apostatize from Judaism is stronger in the Talmud teachings of the Oral law of the sages. Hilkhoth Akum (X, 2) states that defectors must be killed.

"These things [supra] are intended for idolaters. But bliptes also, who lapse from their religion and become epicureans, are to be killed, and we must persecute them to the end. For they afflict blip and turn the people from God." 51.

Christians or converted blips who affect a blipish demeanor or compromise Christian doctrine to appeal to the blipish mindset are surrendering the precious pearl of Jesus Christ who alone leads to salvation. The ecumenical approach does not lead blips to Jesus Christ, but patronizes their religion of dead works, and results in the Christian's acceptance of religion on blipish terms.

"Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Behold, I Paul, say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace. For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith. For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love. Ye did run well; who did hinder you that ye should not obey the truth? This persuasion cometh not of him that calleth you.

Common Ideas

Contemporary blipish thought reflects the same aversion to Jesus Christ as historical Judaism:

"blips vary about what they think of Jesus as a man. Some respect him as an ethical teacher who accepted blipish law, as someone who didn't even see himself as the messiah, who didn't want to start a new religion at all. Rather, Jesus is seen by these blips as someone who challenged the religious authorities of his day for their practices. In this view, he meant to improve Judaism according to his own understanding not to break with it." 52.

"With the composition of the Gospels, then, a fictitious Jesus was created, suitable for the needs of the Hellenistic Gentile-Christian Church. The Prophet King, human and blipish, who was revered but not worshiped by the blipish-Christian Church was turned into a Divine Sacrifice. Jesus, who was, in reality, an apocalyptic Pharisee rabbi who claimed the titles of Prophet and King, was turned into a pagan god." 53.

"Whatever the blipish response is, one point is crucial. No one who is blipish, no born blip and no one who converts to Judaism, can believe in Jesus as the literal son of God or as the messiah. For the blipish people, there is no God but God." 54.

We could elaborate further on the blipish thought regarding the New Testament, the writings of Paul, who was viewed as a heretic, and the disciples. We could expand the idea that many blips believe that James and Peter were Pharisaic Rabbis, who believed in the blipish idea of the Messiah-- that Jesus was not divine.

We could expand on the theory that James, believed to have been the head of the Nazarene movement, was not in any way in conflict with the teachings of the Pharisees, but was devout in promoting them. We could expand on the blipish idea that Paul, not Jesus, is viewed as the originator of Christianity, of the concept of Jesus being divine, and that notion came from Greek paganism. We could, but one only has to go to blipish sites and see that their beliefs are diametrically opposed to Christianity. Sadly, we would also see the denial of the virgin birth and condemnation of all connected to Christ. They are devout in their convictions.

While the blip or messianic movements urge us to embrace "our foundational blip roots", Scripture tells us that our foundation is none other than Jesus Christ:

"For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. "

If blipish teachers or teachings cannot entertain the idea of a divine Christ or Messiah, sin, salvation, eternity, and other issues, what then? How are we to learn the 'True Meaning' of Scripture from them, unless we reject the very truths of Jesus Christ, salvation, sin and the rest of the New Testament?

As stated above, "No one who is blipish, no born blip and no one who converts to Judaism, can believe in Jesus as the literal son of God or as the messiah."

blipish convictions proclaim a Christian cannot be considered blipish or adopt the blipish beliefs, rituals and ceremonies, and still remain a Christian. It would be like becoming a Christian Muslim or a Christian Mormon -- an impossibility.

"This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?"

We cannot be both. Cultural heritage and genealogy cannot take precedence over our faith and obedience to Christ. If it does, we are not serving Him, as we should.

If the Talmud and other blipish works are upholding the doctrines as described above, from the past and today, what business do Christians have embracing these teachings, rituals and ceremonies and the reasons for them?

Reason tells us that the theology of the blipish Rabbis and teachers, which are opposed to the very foundations of our beliefs, influences every aspect of their sacred books…and their teachings. We need to explore the instructions within the Talmud further.

By Victoria Dillen
Email: luke.dillan@sk.sympatico.ca
Homepage: http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/ukesta/

Footnotes

1. blipish Encyclopædia, article on Jesus; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster," Secret Societies and Subversive Movements", p. 20; Omni Publications, 1964
2. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; The Talmud Unmasked: The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians; The Talmud; Part One, ch.1, Jesus Christ in the Talmud; holypiano covers.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid.
5. cf. Baring -Gould, op.cit., quoting Talmud, treatise Sabbath, folio 104, (S. Baring-Gould, The Counter Gospels, 1874); 5. Ibid., p.55, quoting Talmud, treatise Sanhedrim, folio 107, and Sota, folio 47; Eliphas Levi, La Science des Esprits, pp.32,33. As Cited in Nesta H. Webster, op.cit., p..20
6. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; op.cit. Part One, Ch. 1, Jesus Christ in the Talmud
7. Andrew Gould, "SOME DISTURBING ASPECTS OF THE SO-CALLED "blip ROOTS' MOVEMENT, AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS, 1998
8. Ibid.
9. Rene Guenon, Le Theosophisme, (1921) p.193, quoting Le Lotus for December, 1887; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,p.299.
10. Elipha Levi, La Science des Esprits, p. 40; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p.20.
11. The book was translated in Latin by Raymond Martin; German by Luther under the name Schem Hamphorasch; French by Gustave Brunet, Evangiles Apocryphes; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p.21.
12. 2. Graetz, Geschichte der Juden, III. 216-52 as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p. 23
13. Nesta H. Webster, Ibid., p.20 Ibid., p.22.
14. Joseph Barclay, The Talmud, pp.38,39; cf Drach , op.cit I. 167 as Cited Webster,
15. Ibid. pp. 18-19.
16. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein; "The Differences between Judaism and Christianity"; The Conversion to Judaism Home page: http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
17. blips for Judaism,
http://www.blipsforjudaism.org/javasite/webdocs/messianicjudaism.html 18. Hyam Maccoby; "Revolution in Judaea: Jesus and the blipish Resistance"; p. 100; Ocean Books; 1973
19. Ibid., pp. 101-102.
20. Ibid., p. 106.
21. Ibid., p. 128.
22. blips for Judaism, http://www.blipsforjudaism
23. Hyam Maccoby, op. cit., p.100.
24. blipish Guardian for January 25,1924; as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op.cit.,p. 375.
25. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
26. Maccoby, Ibid. , acknowledgements.
27. Ibid., pp. 147-148
28. Ibid., p. 194
29. Ibid., p. 149
30. Ibid., pp. 102-103
31. J.P Stehaln, The Traditions of the blips, II.215-20, quoting from the Talmud treatises Baba Bathra folio 74b, Pesachim folio 32, Bekhoroth folio 57, Massektoth Ta'anith folio 31. The Zohar also refers to the female Leviathan (section Bô, de Pauly's trans., III.167) Drach shows that amongst the delights promised by the Talmud after the return to blip will be the permission to eat pork and bacon. --De l'Harmonie entre l'Eglise et la Synagogue, I. 265, 276, quoting treatise Hullin, folio 17, 82. As Cited in, Pg. 372, "Secret Societies and Subversive Movements" by Nesta H. Webster; Omni Publications, Eighth edition, 1964.]
32. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
33. Ibid.
34. Maccoby, op. cit., p. 105.
35. Maccoby, Ibid., p. 194-195
36. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm 37. Ibid.
38. Peter Michas; Ha-Talmidim Trinity Discussion; also see Rod of the Almond Tree.
39. Peter Michas, THE ROD OF AN ALMOND TREE IN GOD'S MASTER PLAN, WinePress Publishing, (Mukilteo, WA 98275) Chapter 14. p. 255-56.
40. Ibid. p. 256.
41. Ibid. p.257.
42. Ibid.
43. Ibid.
44. Paul Vulliaud, La Kabbale Juive: histoire et doctrine, Vol. II. p. 411, as Cited in Nesta H. Webster, op.cit., p.15.
45. blipish Encyclopœdia, article on Cabala, p.478; Cited in: Webster, Ibid. p. 15.
46. Avi ben Mordechai, Halacha, www.millenium7000.com/halacha.htm
47. Zohar, treatise Toldoth Noah, folio 59b, (De Pauly trans., I, 347; 5. Zohar, treatise Lekh-Lekha, folio 94a (De Pauly trans., I, 535); as Cited in: Nesta H. Webster, op.cit., p.13.
48. Zohar, treatise Bereschith, folio 25a (De Pauly trans. I, 161); 7. The Emek ha Melek is the work of the Cabalist Naphtali, a disciple of Luria; as Cited in Ibid.,p.13
49. Rev. I. B. Pranaitis; The Talmud Unmasked; holypiano covers.org/txt/talmud_unmasked.html
50. blips for Judaism, www.blipsforjudaism.org/javasite/webdocs/chalenge.html
51. Pranaitis, op.cit.
52. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit., http://www.convert.org/differ.htm
53. Maccoby, op. cit., p. 246.
54. Dr. Lawrence J. Epstein, op.cit, http://www.convert.org/differ.htm

TO EMBRACE blip ROOTS: IV

by Victoria Dillen

THE TALMUD: DEMONS AND MAGIC

Psalms 1:1-2 "Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful. But his delight is in the law of the Lord; and in his law doth he meditate day and night."

In order to fully understand what the Talmud sages believe and teach in their expansive Sacred blipish books, we need to examine the information written therein and weigh it with the Word of God. Investigating the blip Roots movement, which promotes the study of the writings of the Talmud, Midrash and Mishnah, we find the common thread of blipish Mysticism.

The well-respected "On the Kabbalah and Its Symbolism" by Gershom Scholem gives some insight into the subliminal process through which mystics of all religions use Scripture to justify their aberrant exegesis of Scripture:

"...not my intention to discuss mystical exegesis in its concrete application to the Bible. Vast numbers of books have been written by blipish mystics attempting to find their own ideas in, or read them into, the Biblical texts... Many productive minds among the Kabbalists found this a congenial way of expressing their own ideas, while making them seem to flow from the words of the Bible. It is not always easy, in a given case, to determine whether the Biblical text inspired the exegesis or whether the exegesis was a deliberate device, calculated to bridge the gap between the old and the new vision by reading completely new ideas into the text. But this perhaps is to take too rationalistic a view of what goes on in the mind of a mystic. Actually the thought processes of mystics are largely unconscious, and they may be quite unapiano coverse of the clash between old and new which is of such passionate interest to the historian. They are thoroughly steeped in the religious tradition in which they have grown up, and many notions which strike a modern reader as fantastic distortions of a text spring from a conception of Scripture which to the mystic seems perfectly natural. For one thing can be said with certainty about Kabbalists is this: they are, and do their best to remain, traditionalists, as is indicated by the very word Kabbalah, which is one of the blip words for 'tradition.'" 1.

Some will argue that mysticism is far removed from the Judaic writings. blip Roots leaders advocating the study of the Mishnah or Midrash would most likely not provide critical information on occultism so that we might compare. However, history reveals that mysticism has had a profound influence in Judaism, and thought to be chiefly conveyed in the sacred writings.

"Mysticism and mystical experiences have been a part of Judaism since the earliest days. The Torah contains many stories of mystical experiences, from visitations by angels to prophetic dreams and visions. The Talmud considers the existence of the soul and when it becomes attached to the body. blipish tradition tells that the souls of all blips were in existence at the time of the Giving of the Torah and were present at the time and agreed to the Covenant…"2.

"The Sacred Books of the blips, shows that the Rabbis who contributed to the Talmud did not maintain pure Biblical teachings.

"The Rabbis of the Talmud speculated on these mysteries, particularly when they were commenting on Genesis and the visions of Ezekiel. The speculations were later embroidered by new ideas that entered blipish thought from the Syriac Greeks, the Zoroastrian Babylonians, and the Gnostic sect of the Byzantium Christians. From these foreign and domestic concepts and myths, the blips wove into their mysticism ideas of upper and neither worlds, angels, and demons, ghosts and spirits - ideas that had been unknown or of little importance to the blips until then." 3.

An email from James Trimm of SANJ, announced "Torah Talk" featuring Avi ben Mordechai who planned to teach Genesis from the esoteric or mystical point of view:

"…we are going to be addressing Genesis Chapter 1 in relation to the creation story... You’ll also get an introduction into what is called by the blipish Mystics "Ein Sof" and "Nothingness," concepts taught by Paul in Colossians 1:15 and by Yochanan in the book of Yochanan 1:1-3. This is part of our program for January 16, 1999, on Torah Talk, as we unveil the Creation Story at its Scientific and Mystical levels." 4.

Ein Sof is the theosophical designation of a god of infinity who is "primordial nothingness" and "the annihilation of thought", according to The Essential Kabbalah, by Daniel C. Matt, "America's foremost poet laureate of Kabbalah":

"The first sefirah [emanation of Ein Sof] …is sometimes referred to as Ayin, Nothingness…In [the] primal state, God is undifferentiated being, neither this nor that, no-thingness… In the depths of Binah [second sefirah] lies Hokhmah, Wisdom. The mystic is nourished from this sphere. Profound and primal, it cannot be known consciously, only absorbed. In the words of Isaac the Blind, one of the earliest kabbalists of Provence, 'The inner, subtle essences can be contemplated only by sucking, not by knowing.' Beyond Hokhmah is the Nothingness of Keter, the annihilation of thought. In this ultimate sefirah human consciousness expands, dissolving into infinity." 5.

Scripture tells us that God is approachable and knowable through Jesus Christ:

John 14: 6,7: "Jesus saith unto him, " I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him."

John 14:21: "He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him."

John 14:23: "Jesus answered and said unto him, "If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him."

TALMUDIC MAGIC

The Talmud encompasses specific teachings involving demonology, legends and myths. Regarding demonology in Europe, author and historian, Nesta Webster shows the preoccupation of the Talmudic rabbis with demons.

"…demonology in Europe was essentially a blipish science…Thus the Talmud says: " if the eye could perceive the demons that people the universe, existence would be impossible. The demons are more numerous than we are: they surround us on all sides like trenches dug round vineyards. Every one of us has a thoBlipnd on his left hand and ten thoBlipnd on his right. The discomfort endured by those who attend rabbinical conferences ...comes from the demons mingling with men in these circumstances. Besides, the fatigue one feels in one's knees in walking comes from the demons that one knocks up against at every step. If the clothing of the Rabbis wears out so quickly, it is again because the demons rub up against them. Whoever wants to convince himself of their presence has only to surround his bed with sifted cinders and the next morning he will see the imprints of cock's feet.1". 6.

"The same treatise goes on to give directions for seeing demons by burning portions of a black cat and placing the ashes in one's eye: "then at once one perceives the demons2." The Talmud [treatise Hullin] also explains that devils particularly inhabit the water spouts on houses and are fond of drinking out of water-jugs, therefore it is advisable to pour a little water out of a jug before drinking, so as to get rid of the unclean part.2" 7.

Another section of The Babylonian Talmud provides these piano coversnings about demons, sex, and epileptic children:

"Gittin 70a. The Rabbis taught: "On coming from a privy (outdoor toilet) a man should not have sexual intercourse till he has waited long enough to walk half a mile, because the demon of the privy is with him for that time; if he does, his children will be epileptic." 8.

Recognized as 'pro-Semite' writer, Hermann L. Strack, was quoted from his book "The blips and Human Sacrifice":

"…A strongly "pro-Semite" writer quotes a number of blipish medical writings of the eighteenth century, republished as late as the end of the nineteenth, which show the persistence of these magical formulae amongst the blips…as follows: "For epilepsy kill a cock and let it putrefy." "In order to protect yourself from all evils, gird yourself with the rope with which a criminal has been hung."…"Fox's blood and wolf's blood are good for stone in the bladder, ram's blood for colic, weasel blood for scrofula," etc.--these to be externally applied." 9.

An article on Teutonic Magic by F. Hälsig in "Hastings' Encyclopœdia on Religion and Ethics" provides some insight on past blipish magical practices in the Talmud.

"… [The] article on Magic in Hastings' Encyclopœdia goes on to say that the magical formulae handed down in Latin in ancient medical writings and used by monks were mainly of Eastern origin, derived from the Babylonish, Egyptian and blipish magic…2."

"…if we turn to the Talmud[tract Sabbath] we shall find cures recommended… For example: The eggs of a grasshopper as a remedy for toothache, the tooth of a fox as a remedy for sleep, viz. the tooth of a live fox to prevent sleep and of a dead one to cause sleep, the nail from the gallows where a man was hanged as a remedy for swelling.3." 10.

In the Babylonian Talmud, we find further directions for superstitious and occultic practices:

"Gittin 69a . To heal his flesh a blip should take dust that lies within the shadow of an outdoor toilet, mix with honey and eat it." 11.

"Gittin 69b. To heal the disease of pleurisy ("catarrh") a blip should "take the excrement of a white dog and knead it with balsam, but if he can possibly avoid it he should not eat the dog's excrement as it loosens the limbs." 12.

Galatians 5:20-21 states: "Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."

Since the Talmud is steeped in superstition and occult lore, it should be no surprise to us that those propagating its use would also be promoting occult superstition. Peter Michas posted an email with a list of recommended books deemed necessary in order to study under him, and this book list includes the Talmud.

Editor: Balaam's Ass Speaks-- Michas has been threatening litigation in E-Mail, which of course is not binding since E-Mail can be counterfeited, in which he tries to stop the following letter from being examined. The authors of these articles claim Michas sent the letter.

"In a message dated 1/23/99 3:47:42 PM Mountain Standard Time, peterm@messengers-of-messiah.org writes:

"The origination of this letter is unknown, but it brings good luck to everyone who passes it on. Just forpiano coversd it to five of your friends to whom you wish good luck. You will see that something good happens to you four MINUTES from now if the chain is not broken. You will receive good luck in four minutes…"

Editor: Balaam's Ass Speaks-- Michas now denies this, but the letter was sent. Pete needs to tell us who sent it. Was a hacker using his E-Mail program etc? Answers to this, instead of the SOP threats he now breathes out, would be welcome.

This is from a "leader" who is being esteemed to lead the flock of Jesus Christ to understand "Truth" and become "Holy". Nowhere can such a precedent be found in Scripture of a man of God indulging in superstition and coarse jesting. On the contrary we read:

Ephesians 5:3-4: "But fornication, and uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks."

"Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things."

"For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."

What a person says, promotes and calls "good" is a clear indication of their character. We are admonished to be holy.

1 Peter 1:14-16: "As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance: But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy."

TALMUDIC DEMONOLOGY

Deuteronomy 18:10-12a: "There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord…"

The Talmud obviously has much in it that would not be acceptable for those who really believe the word of God. The issue of demonolgy and related topics in the Talmud crosses over into Kabbalistic teachings. The blipish Kabbalistic beliefs about demons are found in one of its main books, the Zohar. Future sections of this series will discuss the Kabbalah and its influence on Judaism and the Talmud.

The respected blipish scholar, Gershom Scholem, provides this education on demons according to the Talmud and the transition from Talmudic demonology to the Zohar:

"According to Talmudic tradition, demons are spirits made in the Friday evening twilight, who, because the Sabbath has intervened, have received no bodies. From this later authorities drew the inference (which is perhaps implicit in the Talmudic sources) that the demons have been looking for bodies ever since, and that this is why they attach themselves to men. This entered into a combination with another idea. After the murder of Abel by his brother, Adam decided to have no further dealings with his wife. Thereupon female demons, succubi, came to him and conceived by him; from this union, in which Adam's generative power was misused and misdirected, stem a variety of demons, who are called nig'e bn Adam, 'Spirits of harm that come from man.'1. …practices are systematized in the Zohar, which develops the myth that Lilith, Queen of the demons, or the demons of her retinue, do their best to provoke men to sexual acts without benefit of woman, their aim being to make themselves bodies from the lost seed." 13.

"…These ideas [Talmud demonology] received a fresh impetus from the publication of the Zohar, which, a blipish writer tells us, " from the 14th century held almost unbroken sway over the minds of the majority of the blips. In it the Talmudic legends concerning the existence and activity of the shedhim (demons) are repeated and amplified, and a hierarchy of demons was established corresponding to the heavenly hierarchy… Manasseh [ben blip]'s Nishmat Hayim is full of information concerning belief in demons ...1." 14.

Further reference to the Zohar teachings reveals that men and women have sex with demons during their sleep.

"See the Zohar, treatise Bereschith, folio.54b, where it is said that all men are visited in their sleep "by female devils." These demons never appear under any other form